Organizational hybridity, when organizations cross the boundaries of several social movements, benefits a range of movements. Previous research has demonstrated the positive dimensions of hybridity in feminist and antiwar movements, for example. But could such hybridity also serve to dilute movement ideologies? How exactly does hybridity shape movements and their participants? Under what conditions does hybridity aid or detract from mobilization?
In “Hybrid Activism: Social Movement Mobilization in a Multimovement Environment” (American Journal of Sociology, January 2014), Michael T. Heaney and Fabio Rojas examine hybrid antiwar organizations in an effort to understand the mechanisms of movement hybridity. The authors gathered survey data at “all of the national or nationally coordinated antiwar protest events held in the United State between January 2007 and December 2009,”organizational data such as web content of hybrid organizations, and interview data with activists. Continue reading
I cannot remember the last time the president of the U.S. praised feminist activists. Has it ever happened? Color me surprised when last week, Obama said the “inspiring wave of student led activism” motivated him to create the White House Task Force to Protect Students from Sexual Assault. Okay, so the president didn’t praise feminist activists per se, but feminists have been mobilized around this issue for decades.
Citing the figure that one in five women college students have been sexually assaulted, Obama is giving the task force ninety days to come up with suggestions and initiatives to reduce sexual assault and improve compliance with existing policies. In the last few years, several U.S. colleges have been outed as stymying sexual assault reporting. As evidence mounted about the widespread lack of reporting and mishandling of sexual assault cases by administrators, college activists pressured the federal government to respond and to comply with Title IX. Despite affecting millions of us, never has the issue of sexual assault been given such national attention. Continue reading
Chances are, you remember the flurry of news coverage about San Francisco’s 2004 same-sex weddings, in which over 4,000 same-sex couples wed. In news images, throngs of men and women lined up outside city hall. Jubilant couples radiated with anticipation of becoming legally wed. Brides posed with San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom. Soon, protests for the legalization of same-sex marriage emerged across California and the United States. The excitement was palpable and change was in the air. But, if you were like many people, you may have wondered: Are the same-sex couples who are so passionately fighting to get married motivated by love and devotion to their partners? Is it as an act of protest to gain the rights and privileges bestowed upon different-sex couples? Or, does same-sex marriage uphold heteronormativity or challenge it? Continue reading
In 1961, President John F. Kennedy established the President’s Commission on the Status of Women. The commission and the 1963 report drew national attention to the issue of women’s status in the U.S. It brought to the fore long-standing discussions and tensions about women’s rights, and sparked additional feminist mobilization.
Would you like to brush up on your history of the commission and view footage of President Kennedy and Eleanor Roosevelt discussing women’s rights? Check out the short film “American Women: A Presidential Commission” (http://vimeo.com/77168113).
To honor the anniversary, the Department of Labor is hosting a panel discussion/webcast on the status of women in today’s economy. It is on December 10 at 9 am est. (http://www.dol.gov/dol/media/webcast/live/). [Note: Webcast cancelled due to inclement weather in Washington D.C., post will be updated when new date is announced]
The editors of the Occupy the Future (2013, Boston Review), Stanford faculty David B. Grusky, Doug McAdam, Rob Reich, and Debra Satz, were involved in an Occupy teach-in at Stanford. Short versions of the essays were initially posted online as preparation for the teach-in, and contributors then expanded their essays for Occupy the Future. Building on the momentum of the Occupy movement, the book “offers a broader framework for understanding why rising inequality is the core problem of our time.” According to Rob Reich, contributors were asked to examine the cleavages between American values and practices. Chapters examine economic gender inequality (Shelley J. Correll), educational inequality (Sean F. Reardon), art and Occupy (Michele Elam and Jennifer DeVere Brody) and the language of social justice (H. Samy Alim), among others. Doug McAdam’s chapter looks to the future of Occupy. He argues that Occupy, in its present state, should not be called a social movement, but “in light of the economic and political stakes, this is a challenge worthy of our efforts.” For those of you who are interested in the persistence of Occupy and what top scholars in their fields have to say about it, you should certainly check it out.
Mobilizing Ideas essay also hosted an essay dialogue in January of 2012 on Occupy.
It is October, and you know what that means. The color pink is everywhere. Perhaps you were tempted to purchase a pink ribbon bracelet or t-shirt at the department store. Your favorite NFL team may be wearing pink jerseys on game day. If you reside in Detroit, a pink tow truck may have towed your car. Maybe you even enjoyed a Susan B. Komen sponsored pink bucket of Kentucky Fried Chicken during their ill-fated “Buckets for the Cure” campaign. The proceeds of these products are said to raise awareness about breast cancer. Critics argue that focusing on awareness is less useful than funding research on breast cancer prevention or causes. Plenty of people have eloquently critiqued said pinkwashing. But have you incorporated it into your classrooms this month? I found it to be a useful teaching tool for undergraduates. Continue reading