Anonymous, Megaupload, and the New Tactics of Hacktivism

As a followup to my last post about the planned day of protests against SOPA and PIPA I also want to touch upon an event that also involved online activists and activism but occurred just a day after the internet blackout. On Thursday, January 19th,  the US Department of Justice shut down the popular file-sharing site Megaupload for a variety of offenses, most prominently the sharing of illegally pirated movies and music.

While this action by the Justice Department does touch upon some issues of interest to social movement scholars, especially those interested in movements to protect intellectual property, it was the response of the online activist group Anonymous that bears the most attention. Immediately after the announced seizure of Megaupload the hacker collective Anonymous issues a statement condemning the attack and promising retribution against the DoJ. This retribution took the form of a botnet that launched a DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) attack against the DoJ website. This attack was noteworthy in that it used the computers of curious bystanders who merely needed to click on a link provided by various Anonymous affiliated media sites without getting the permission of these bystanders in what is typically considered a criminal act.

This tactic by Anonymous used the computers of curious bystanders to further their own movement goals and also showed why cybersecurity and the exact dimensions of legal vs. illegal online protest have become such hot topics among those of us that research these topics.

For more information regarding the group Anonymous and their past activism I highly recommend Quinn Norton’s series on the group that she did for Wired’s Threat Level blog last year:

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Or a short (not work safe) video on the history of the group.

5 Comments

Filed under Daily Disruption

5 responses to “Anonymous, Megaupload, and the New Tactics of Hacktivism

  1. Megauploadlover

    Please help us anonymous! Screw FBI. This is Internet injustice! Please help us get megaupload back on.

  2. If the American jury thinks Mr Dotcom’s likely sentence is excessive, it can acquit him regardless of the “law” and the facts, and the acquittal is binding. It’s called “jury nullification”. But the jurors won’t be told this in court. They’ll need to hear about it from elsewhere. Spread the word!

  3. Pingback: hacktivism has gone mainstream « Precise Payment Solutions

  4. Pingback: hacktivism has gone mainstream « eComTechnology

  5. Pingback: hacktivism has gone mainstream « eComTechnology Network

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s